IHC 2025

The Innovative Ideas and Emerging Results track has become a consolidated space within I H C for the presentation and discussion of original and thought-provoking research in the field of H C I, to accelerate the exposure of the scientific community to new ideas, themes, theories, and promising or inspiring results. In line with this premise, submissions in the form of essays or position papers are also encouraged, especially those that offer critical reflections and philosophical, provocative, or speculative discussions relevant to the Brazilian H C I community. Submissions may employ a variety of approaches, drawing not only on empirical results but also on theoretical arguments, philosophical analyses, interdisciplinary perspectives, and other methods that challenge established paradigms. If your research proposes new directions, questions assumptions, or experiments with innovative ideas, this is the right space to share it.

Important: Please note that this is not a track for short papers, but rather a venue for presenting and sharing critical discussions, emerging and potentially innovative research, or disruptive techniques and perspectives that challenge the status quo in H C I and may expand the boundaries of the field. If your research is still in its early stages and lacks results that enable in-depth discussion, the correct track for your submission is the Posters and Demonstrations track.

This Track Review Process

Submissions will be rejected without review (desk reject) if (1) they do not comply with all submission instructions provided here and at the GENERAL CALL FULL PAPERS, (2) they are outside the scope of the Innovative Ideas and Emerging Results Track, or (3) they have been submitted or published in any other forum (conference or journal). All other papers will be reviewed by at least three members of the program committee. If the submission is accepted, the authors should consider the comments from the reviewers to prepare the final version of the paper.

Review the following checklist. Reviewers should evaluate each paper according to these criteria:

Adherence to the track: does the paper adhere to the Innovative Ideas and Emerging Results Track? 

  • Does the paper share innovative ideas? The aim is to increase understanding and awareness of the innovative idea being discussed. This idea may help expand and define relevant topics related to problems investigated in H C I.
  • Does the paper present and discuss emerging results? Emerging results are characterized as partial and/or preliminary findings that represent a stage in a research process that is still ongoing, already allowing for critical reflection and discussion with the community.
  • Does the paper critically discuss a topic relevant to the community? This involves a well-supported argument and defense of a position on a topic that is relevant to the Brazilian H C I community.
  • Quality of textual presentation: is the paper well written and adequately presented in terms of language, content and form, following the event model?

Examples of Papers

Track Coordination

Innovative Ideas and Emerging Results Track

Emanuel Duarte (UNICAMP) – emanuel@ic.unicamp.br 

Vinícius Pereira (U F M T) – vinicius.pereira@ufmt.br

Program Committee

Ailton Santos Ribeiro – Universidade Federal da Bahia
Alessandro Rubim Assis – Nuance Communications
André Pimenta Freire – Universidade Federal de Lavras
André Constantino da Silva – Instituto Federal de São Paulo
Angela Lima Peres – Universidade de Ciências da Saúde de Alagoas
Angelica Cunha dos Santos – Universidade Estadual de Campinas
Camilla Tenorio Brennand – Universidade Estadual de Campinas
Carla Rodriguez – Universidade Federal do ABC
Carolina Sacramento – Fundação Oswaldo Cruz
Claiton Marques Correa – Instituto Federal de Farroupilha
Claudia Cappelli – Universidade Estadual do Rio de Janeiro
Cristiane Aparecida Lana – Universidade Federal de Lavras
Deógenes P. Silva Junior – Universidade Federal do Paraná
Diego Moreira da Rosa – Instituto Federal do Rio Grande do Sul
Eduardo H. Tanaka – Instituto de Pesquisa Eldorado
Erik Henrique da Costa Nunes – Universidade Federal do Ceará
George Augusto Valença Santos – Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco
Ingrid Teixeira Monteiro – Universidade Federal do Ceará
Isabela Gasparini – Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina
Jean Rosa – Centro Universitário Maurício de Nassau de Aracaju
Josiane R. de O. Gaia Pimenta – Universidade Estadual de Campinas
Juliana de Albuquerque Saraiva – Universidade Federal da Paraíba
Kamila Rodrigues – Universidade de São Paulo
Larissa Lucena Vasconcelos – Instituto Federal da Paraíba
Leandro Marques Queiros – Universidade Federal de Pernambuco
Leandro Soares Guedes – Instituto Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul
Leo Natan Paschoal – Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná
Letícia Seixas Pereira – Universidade de Lisboa
Luan Silva – Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia do Sudeste de Minas Gerais
Luciana Borges – Universidade Federal do Mato Grosso
Luciana Cardoso de Castro Salgado – Universidade Federal Fluminense
Ludmilla F. O. Galvão – Universidade Federal do Mato Grosso
Luiz Paulo Carvalho – Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro
Luã Marcelo Muriana – Universidade Estadual de Campinas
Marcelo Martins da Silva – Universidade Federal do Ceará
Marcos Alexandre Rose Silva – Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
Maria Lira – Universidade Federal do Mato Grosso
Maria Lucia Bento Villela – Universidade Federal de Viçosa
Mariana Gomes Borges – Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul
Marilia Soares Mendes – Universidade Federal do Ceará
Mateus dos Santos – Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia do Sul de Minas Gerais
Mateus de Souza Monteiro – Universidade Federal Fluminense
Matheus Oliveira Gomes – Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia do Sudeste de Minas Gerais
Milene Silveira – Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul
Ozonias Junior – Universidade Federal de Pernambuco
Pedro Borela – Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia do Sudeste de Minas Gerais
Phelipe Dias Feio – Universidade Federal do Pará
Rafael Parizi – Instituto Federal de Farroupilha
Renan Vinicius Aranha – Universidade Federal do Mato Grosso
Roberto Pereira – Universidade Federal do Paraná
Rogerio Lopes Vieira Cesar – Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia do Ceará
Sílvia Amélia Bim – Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná
Soraia Silva Prietch – Universidade Federal do Mato Grosso
Tânia Saraiva de Melo Pinheiro – Universidade Federal do Ceará
Thiago Adriano Coleti – Universidade Estadual do Norte do Paraná
Ticianne Darin – Universidade Federal do Ceará
Ueuder Castro do Nascimento – Universidade Federal do Mato Grosso
Vania Neris – Universidade Federal de São Carlos
Virgínia Fernandes Mota – Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais
Willian Garcias Assuncao – Universidade Federal de São Carlos
Yuska Paola Costa Aguiar – Universidade Federal da Paraíba

 

Important Dates

  • Submission registration: May 05, 2025 
  • Paper submission: May 12, 2025 – Final Date (previously May 05) 
  • 1st notification of results: June 24, 2025
  • Resubmission (replica and revised version): July 08, 2025
  • 2nd notification of results: July 23, 2025 
  • Submission of the final version: August 04, 2025
  • Presentation: during IHC 2025 (September 08 to 10, 2025)