Papers in the Experience Reports Track must describe, in detail, experiences related to H C I, with theoretical and methodological basis. It is expected that the articles in this track carefully describe experiences focused on the area of H C I, be it, for example, in the field of HCI teaching, in the evaluation of experiences of/by users, in the adoption of H C I concepts and methods in university extension actions, as well as experiences in industry (public or private) with theoretical and methodological foundations in the area. We invite teachers, extensionists and industry professionals (public or private sector) who work in the area to submit complete articles to the Experience Reports Track.
In their experience report, the authors must characterize the context, the parties involved and the relevance of the reported experience; they must also be attentive to the quality of the methodological presentation for appropriation by other people; in addition to providing opportunities for meaningful reflections on this experience based on adequate theoretical-methodological foundations.
Submissions will be rejected without review (desk reject) if (1) they do not comply with all submission instructions provided here and at the GENERAL CALL FULL PAPERS, (2) they are outside the scope of the Experience Reports Track, or (3) they have been submitted or published in any other forum (conference or journal). All other papers will be reviewed by at least three members of the program committee. If the submission is accepted, the authors should consider the comments from the reviewers to prepare the final version of the paper.
Review the following checklist. Reviewers should evaluate each paper according to these criteria:
Recent studies published in the Experience Reports Track that exemplify good practices and meet the criteria described above:
Taciana Pontual Falcão (U F R P E) – taciana.pontual@ufrpe.br
Tiago Silva da Silva (UNIFESP) – silva.tiago@unifesp.br
